Kim MonsonKim Monson · Colorado Voter's Guide 2026
Amendment
85
Initiative 234
On the November 2026 ballot

Amendment 85 (Initiative 234): requiring ballot questions to be written in plain language

Amendment 85 would require state and local ballot questions to use plain language at no more than an eighth-grade reading level. It would also bar statutory wording requirements that interfere with that standard in an initiative’s ballot title. The amendment does not define the reading standard or say who would apply it.
Kim's recommendation
YES
Kim's recommendation
YES
Vote Yes on Plain Language Ballot Questions
Kim's Reasoning:

James Madison, fourth president of the United States and father of our Constitution said: “It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men of their own choice if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood.” VOTE YES ON PLAIN LANGUAGE BALLOT QUESTIONS.

Kim Monson
Kim Monson
Host, The Kim Monson Show · President, Colorado Union of Taxpayers · Colorado Voter's Guide 2026
Certified ballot question
Certified ballot title

Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado Constitution concerning ballot question language, and, in connection therewith, requiring all state and local ballot questions to be written in plain language and at no more than an 8th grade reading level and prohibiting a state statute from requiring language that conflicts with these requirements in ballot questions for citizen-initiated measures?

A yes vote means

State and local ballot questions must be written in plain language at no more than an eighth-grade reading level, and no statute may interfere with that requirement by mandating language before, after or in an initiative's ballot title. The rule is added to the constitution, so approval requires 55 percent.

A no vote means

Current plain-language requirements remain in effect, without an eighth-grade reading limit.

Key facts
Takes effect
Within 30 days of the canvass
When the governor proclaims the result, after voters approve it.
Estimated state cost
$0 in the table
Fiscal years 2025–26 and 2026–27. The note anticipates a small increase in Title Board work.
Votes needed to pass
55%
Of votes cast on the amendment.
Sunset

The amendment would take effect on the governor’s proclamation after voter approval, within 30 days after the official canvass. It has no expiration date.

TABOR treatment

The measure sets no tax, rate or fee. Table 1 of the May 5, 2026 fiscal impact statement shows no change in TABOR refunds in FY 2025-26 or FY 2026-27. The review and comment memorandum asked the proponents how the measure's bar on statutory language mandates would interact with the ballot language requirements in article X, section 20 of the Colorado Constitution.

Cost signal

Table 1 of the fiscal impact statement shows $0 in state revenue, $0 in state expenditures, $0 in transferred funds, no change in TABOR refunds and 0.0 FTE in state staffing in FY 2025-26 and FY 2026-27. The one impact the statement lists is "Minimal State Workload".

The measure01

Amendment 85 would require ballot questions to be written in plain language at an eighth-grade reading level

Amendment 85 would add a subsection to article V, section 1 of the Colorado Constitution, the section that governs measures initiated by or referred to the people. The filed text is two sentences. The first reads "BALLOT QUESTIONS SHALL BE IN PLAIN LANGUAGE AT NO MORE THAN AN EIGHTH-GRADE READING LEVEL." The second reads "NO STATUTE MAY INTERFERE WITH THIS PROVISION BY MANDATING LANGUAGE PRECEDING, FOLLOWING, OR IN A BALLOT TITLE OF AN INITIATIVE." A no vote leaves the constitution unchanged.

The first sentence applies to “ballot questions” without a qualifier; the second addresses statutory wording requirements in an initiative’s ballot title. The certified ballot title describes the first rule as covering all state and local ballot questions. Legislative reviewers asked whether either sentence would also apply to measures referred by the legislature. At the February 20, 2026 review and comment hearing, a designated representative said they thought the first sentence applies to all ballot questions, and said the second sentence applies only to initiatives.

The second sentence binds statutes. It says no statute may interfere with the plain-language provision by mandating language preceding, following or in the ballot title of an initiative. It does not reach language the constitution itself requires.

Who placed it on the ballot

Amendment 85 qualified for the ballot through the petition process. The review and comment memorandum of February 18, 2026, from Legislative Council Staff and the Office of Legislative Legal Services, is addressed to Suzanne Taheri and Michael Fields as the measure's designated representatives. It also covers Initiative 235, which the memorandum says was submitted by the same designated representatives.

The statewide questions on the November 2026 ballot run from 26 to 289 words
Proposition 136 (Initiative 232)26 words
Amendment 82 (Initiative 177)40 words
Amendment 81 (Initiative 95)55 words
Amendment 8559 words
Proposition 133 (Initiative 108)68 words
Amendment 86 (Initiative 256)73 words
Proposition 132 (Initiative 85)76 words
Proposition 135 (Initiative 110)83 words
Amendment 84 (Initiative 362)83 words
Proposition NN84 words
Proposition 137 (Initiative 308)87 words
Amendment 83 (Initiative 302)107 words
Proposition 134 (Initiative 109)161 words
Amendment 87 (Initiative 195)289 words
The counts compare the fourteen statewide ballot questions. Amendment 87 (Initiative 195) includes a numerical table in its count. Amendment 85’s own question has 59 words and is the fourth shortest in this comparison. Word count alone does not establish a question’s reading level.
The ballot title and submission clause of each measure as designated and fixed by the Ballot Title Setting Board.
Amendment 85's own ballot question runs 59 words in a single sentence

This is the question voters will read for the measure, as designated and fixed by the Ballot Title Setting Board on March 4, 2026:

Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado Constitution concerning ballot question language, and, in connection therewith, requiring all state and local ballot questions to be written in plain language and at no more than an 8th grade reading level and prohibiting a state statute from requiring language that conflicts with these requirements in ballot questions for citizen-initiated measures?
The ballot title and submission clause for Initiative 234 as designated and fixed by the Ballot Title Setting Board, hearing of March 4, 2026.
Statutory requirements and TABOR’s ballot language

The second sentence of Amendment 85 bars a statute from requiring language before, after or inside the ballot title of an initiative. It reads:

NO STATUTE MAY INTERFERE WITH THIS PROVISION BY MANDATING LANGUAGE PRECEDING, FOLLOWING, OR IN A BALLOT TITLE OF AN INITIATIVE.

The reviewers asked how that would sit with article X, section 20 of the Colorado Constitution, which carries ballot language requirements of its own. Their question was:

How does this interact with the ballot language requirements in article X, section 20 of the Colorado Constitution?
A requirement written into the constitution is not a statute.
The text of Initiative 234 as filed with the Colorado Department of State; review and comment memorandum, February 18, 2026, substantive comment 5.
Amendment 85 adds two sentences to article V, section 1 of the state constitution

The measure adds one subsection. After the enacting clause and the instruction to add subsection (5.6), it reads:

BALLOT QUESTIONS SHALL BE IN PLAIN LANGUAGE AT NO MORE THAN AN EIGHTH-GRADE READING LEVEL.
NO STATUTE MAY INTERFERE WITH THIS PROVISION BY MANDATING LANGUAGE PRECEDING, FOLLOWING, OR IN A BALLOT TITLE OF AN INITIATIVE.
The two sentences run 35 words. With the enacting clause and the instruction to add subsection (5.6), the measure runs 358 characters.
The text of Initiative 234 as filed with the Colorado Department of State.
The money02

The fiscal impact statement estimates no state revenue and no state spending in either year

The fiscal impact statement prepared by Legislative Council Staff and dated May 5, 2026 shows $0 in state revenue, $0 in state expenditures, $0 in transferred funds, no change in TABOR refunds and 0.0 FTE in state staffing in fiscal years 2025-26 and 2026-27. Colorado issues TABOR refunds when state revenue exceeds the constitutional limit. The single impact the statement lists is "Minimal State Workload".

The work falls on the body that writes ballot titles. The statement says the measure "may minimally increase workload for the Title Board in the Department of State" to "make determinations on the standards for plain language and what constitutes an eighth-grade reading level", and adds: "The Title Board may also have additional work to apply these standards when setting titles for citizen ballot measures."

The earlier February 24, 2026 fiscal summary anticipated possible work for the Title Board, Judicial Department and General Assembly. The May 5 statement discusses only Title Board workload. Its table covers fiscal years 2025–26 and 2026–27, not the amendment’s first two years after the November 2026 election.

The measure's figures and dates
The changeAdds subsection (5.6) to article V, section 1 of the Colorado Constitution.Text of Initiative 234 as filed with the Colorado Department of State
LengthTwo sentences, 35 words. With its enacting clause and its instruction to add subsection (5.6), the measure runs 358 characters.Text of Initiative 234 as filed with the Colorado Department of State
State revenue$0 in FY 2025-26 and $0 in FY 2026-27.Table 1, fiscal impact statement, May 5, 2026
State expenditures$0 in FY 2025-26 and $0 in FY 2026-27.Table 1, fiscal impact statement, May 5, 2026
Transferred funds$0 in FY 2025-26 and $0 in FY 2026-27.Table 1, fiscal impact statement, May 5, 2026
Change in TABOR refunds$0 in FY 2025-26 and $0 in FY 2026-27.Table 1, fiscal impact statement, May 5, 2026
Change in state staffing0.0 FTE in FY 2025-26 and 0.0 FTE in FY 2026-27.Table 1, fiscal impact statement, May 5, 2026
The one impact listed"Minimal State Workload". The statement says the measure "may minimally increase workload for the Title Board in the Department of State" to "make determinations on the standards for plain language and what constitutes an eighth-grade reading level", and adds: "The Title Board may also have additional work to apply these standards when setting titles for citizen ballot measures."Fiscal impact statement, May 5, 2026, State Expenditures
Title Board membershipThe statement describes the board as one "which included representatives from the Department of State, the Attorney General Office, and the General Assembly".Fiscal impact statement, May 5, 2026, State Expenditures
Effective dateThe measure sets none. It would take effect on the Governor's proclamation, no later than 30 days after the official canvass of the vote is completed.Fiscal impact statement, May 5, 2026, Effective Date
Petition signatures submittedJuly 20, 2026.Secretary of State initiative status listing
Statement of sufficiencyAugust 28, 2026.Secretary of State initiative status listing
Designated representativesSuzanne Taheri and Michael Fields.Review and comment memorandum, February 18, 2026
Votes needed to pass55 percent of the votes cast, because the measure adds language to the constitution.Ballot Title Setting Board results, hearing of March 4, 2026
Figures from the Legislative Council Staff fiscal impact statement of May 5, 2026 and the Ballot Title Setting Board results for the hearing of March 4, 2026. Petition dates from the Secretary of State's initiative status listing.
Measure provisions03

The Title Board set the titles on March 4, 2026 and determined that 55 percent is required

The Ballot Title Setting Board heard the measure on March 4, 2026. Its results say "Single subject approved (3-0); staff draft amended; titles set." The board members were Theresa Conley, Christy Chase and Kurt Morrison.

Amendment 85 needs 55% of the votes cast because it adds language to the Colorado Constitution.

The results page says the caption "Plain Language Ballot Questions" was applied "by legislative staff for tracking purposes" and "is not part of the titles set by the Board."

The vote threshold

Because the measure adds language to the Colorado Constitution, the Title Board recorded that approval requires 55 percent of the votes cast instead of a simple majority.

Legislative votes on election rules

Among 1,490 Colorado bills with recorded votes from 2021 through 2026, 112 change how elections, ballots, voter rolls or recalls are conducted. Legislators cast 3,663 votes in favor and 1,574 against those bills. This broad comparison does not identify a legislator’s position on Amendment 85.

Colorado General Assembly roll call records, 2021 through 2026.

The reviewers asked who would decide whether a ballot question meets the standard

The measure does not define plain language, and the proponents did not give a specific definition at the hearing. It does not choose a method for measuring an eighth-grade reading level, identify who would decide whether a question complies, or say when that decision would be made. Legislative reviewers asked the proponents to clarify those points.

A third question goes to the second sentence. The reviewers quoted its words and asked: "How does this interact with the ballot language requirements in article X, section 20 of the Colorado Constitution?" They also noted that "may" is "generally construed as permissive" and asked whether "no statute may interfere" was meant to be permissive or mandatory; the filed text keeps that wording. At the hearing, a designated representative answered, "They're meant to be mandatory," and said they thought the proponents had made that change. The certified text still reads "no statute may interfere".

The measure defines neither plain language nor an eighth-grade reading level, and names no body to apply either standard. The fiscal impact statement expects the Title Board to make those determinations; the text does not say so.

The memorandum also notes that the measure supplies no effective date of its own: "Because the proposed initiatives do not contain an effective date, this would be the default effective date. The hearing recording carries no audible answer to that question."

The reviewers asked what the standard is and who would apply it

The review and comment memorandum of February 18, 2026, from Legislative Council Staff and the Office of Legislative Legal Services, put eight substantive questions to Suzanne Taheri and Michael Fields. Three of them go to whether the requirement can be applied.

The standard
What is the standard for determining whether language is at an eighth-grade reading level? Have the proponents identified any ballot questions that comply with this requirement?
At the hearing, a designated representative said they had not identified a Colorado ballot question that meets the standard, though one might, and that "other states have this same mandate," naming Arkansas and, they thought, Washington. They said they thought existing accessibility standards and platforms could provide a way to measure reading level, and that they did not want to name a method in the constitution that might later go away.
The deciding body and the timing
Who is responsible for determining whether ballot questions are “in plain language” and “at no more than an eighth grade reading level”, and at what stage during the initiative process should this determination be made?
At the hearing, a designated representative said, "right now it's the title board for initiatives." For a measure referred by the legislature, they thought it would be whoever drafts the title. The proponents did not say at what stage the decision is made.
The constitution's own wording requirements
How does this interact with the ballot language requirements in article X, section 20 of the Colorado Constitution?
At the hearing, a designated representative said the second sentence concerns statutes. They said that if the language is already required by the constitution and a statute "is just facilitating what's in the Constitution, then I don't think it conflicts."
Review and comment memorandum, Legislative Council Staff and the Office of Legislative Legal Services, February 18, 2026, substantive comments 5, 7 and 8.
Terms at issue in Amendment 85

Amendment 85 requires ballot questions to be "IN PLAIN LANGUAGE" at "NO MORE THAN AN EIGHTH-GRADE READING LEVEL".

Plain languageWording readers can readily understand. The amendment requires it but supplies no specific test.
Eighth-grade reading levelA limit on reading difficulty. The amendment does not name a formula or method for measuring it.
Ballot question and ballot titleThe wording a voter reads on the ballot, and the formal statement the Ballot Title Setting Board designates and fixes for a measure; the reviewers noted that article V, section 1 of the constitution instead refers to "measures to be voted on" and asked whether the different terms were intended.
The Title BoardThe state body that sets the ballot title for a citizen initiative, described in the fiscal impact statement as the Title Board in the Department of State, "which included representatives from the Department of State, the Attorney General Office, and the General Assembly".
Citizen-initiated measureA measure placed on the ballot by petition rather than by the legislature; Amendment 85's own ballot title describes its second sentence as "prohibiting a state statute from requiring language that conflicts with these requirements in ballot questions for citizen-initiated measures".
The text of Initiative 234; the ballot title designated and fixed by the Ballot Title Setting Board; the Legislative Council Staff fiscal impact statement of May 5, 2026; the review and comment memorandum of February 18, 2026.

Statutory wording requirements and the constitution

The amendment would prevent a statute from requiring ballot-title language that interferes with the plain-language standard. TABOR’s own ballot-language requirements are in the constitution. Legislative reviewers asked how the proposed provision would interact with them.

Vote Common Sense’s registration covers nine measures; Brighter Colorado supports six and opposes two. Neither committee’s totals can be attributed to Amendment 85 alone.

The committees' organization money by source
Brighter Colorado reports $295,000 from organizations in 3 filings. The largest: Common Sense America $250,000; Rado Capital $25,000; Advance Colorado $20,000. Because its registration covers several measures, none of these amounts can be attributed to Amendment 85 alone.
Vote Common Sense reports $395,000 from organizations in 9 filings. The largest: Green Advocacy Project $200,000; Coloradans for Real Safety Solutions $50,000; Colorado Immigrant Rights Coalition Action Fund $50,000. Because its registration covers several measures, none of these amounts can be attributed to Amendment 85 alone.
The filings record no organization contributions to People for a Fair Colorado. Contributions from individuals are outside this view.
TRACER filing, October 3, 2026.
Campaign support and opposition04

Suzanne Taheri and Michael Fields are the measure's designated representatives

Amendment 85 reached the ballot through the petition process. Petition signatures were submitted on July 20, 2026, the Secretary of State issued a statement of sufficiency on August 28, 2026, and the Secretary of State's initiative page lists the measure as on the 2026 ballot.

Suzanne Taheri and Michael Fields are the measure’s designated representatives.

The memorandum covers a second measure alongside this one. It says proposed initiatives 2025-2026 #234 and #235 "were submitted by the same designated representatives as a series of proposed initiatives." As the memorandum describes it, #235 carries the same requirements and also caps ballot questions at 100 words.

Representatives and the 100-word companion proposal

Suzanne Taheri and Michael Fields submitted Initiatives 234 and 235. Both proposed plain language at no more than an eighth-grade reading level; Initiative 235 also proposed a 100-word limit. Amendment 85 (Initiative 234), the measure on this ballot, has no word limit.

The word limit is in the companion draft and not in Amendment 85. Amendment 85 is the version on the November 2026 ballot.
Review and comment memorandum, Legislative Council Staff and the Office of Legislative Legal Services, February 18, 2026.
For
Against
TRACER filing, October 7, 2026
Sources06
Official documents
Further reading
Official documents
  • 2026 State Ballot Information BookletColorado Legislative Council · Sep 24, 2026
    The Colorado Legislative Council's 2026 ballot information booklet entry on Amendment 85 explains that it would require ballot titles to be written at no more than an eighth-grade reading level and would bar laws requiring added language in citizen-initiative titles, and notes the measure does not define plain language or say who decides whether a title meets the standard.
  • Colorado General Assembly ballot analysis landing page for Amendment 85 (short title Plain Language Ballot Titles), listing research staff, draft deadlines and links to the measure text and Blue Book analysis, but not itself giving the ballot title text.
  • Legislative Council Staff fiscal summary of Initiative 234 (Amendment 85), dated February 24, 2026, finding possible increased workload for the Title Board and others and no expected direct economic impact.
  • Legislative Council Staff fiscal impact statement for Initiative 234 (Amendment 85), dated May 5, 2026, projecting minimal state workload and $0 in state revenue, expenditures and TABOR refund changes.
  • Legislative Council Staff and Office of Legislative Legal Services review and comment memorandum dated February 18, 2026 on proposed initiatives #234 (Amendment 85) and #235, stating their purposes and raising substantive and technical questions.
  • Text of the measure as filedColorado General Assembly
    Original draft text of Initiative 2025-2026 #234 (Amendment 85) as received by Legislative Council Staff on Feb. 6, 2026, captioned 'Plain Language Ballot Questions' (not 'Plain Language Ballot Titles'), adding a constitutional plain-language, eighth-grade reading level requirement.
Show 3 more
  • Colorado Title Board results page for Proposed Initiative #234 (Amendment 85), giving the ballot title requiring plain-language ballot questions at no more than an 8th grade reading level and the March 4, 2026 hearing outcome.
  • Secretary of State filing of the final text of 2025-2026 Initiative #234 (Amendment 85), which adds Article V, Section 1(5.6) requiring ballot questions in plain language at no more than an eighth-grade reading level.
  • Video of the February 20, 2026 public review and comment hearing on Initiative 234, where the proponents answered the reviewers' questions.
News coverage
  • ENDORSEMENT: To put it plainly — YES on Amendment 85The Denver Gazette · Sep 23, 2026 · limited free access
    Denver Gazette editorial board endorsement (Sep 23, 2026) urging a yes vote on Amendment 85, describing its plain-language, eighth-grade reading level requirement and its bar on statutes mandating ballot title language.
  • Denver Post opinion column by Krista Kafer (Sep 8, 2026) arguing against Initiative 234 (Amendment 85), the proposed eighth-grade reading level requirement for ballot questions, as a power play by Advance Colorado that invites litigation.
Policy analysis
  • Bell Policy Center petition explainer (May 26, 2026, updated after Aug. 3) covering many proposed initiatives, with a dedicated section on Initiative 234 (Amendment 85) giving a summary, key facts on existing mandated ballot language, and arguments for and against.
Campaigns and committees
  • Brighter ColoradoColorado Secretary of State · Jul 6, 2026
  • Vote Common SenseColorado Secretary of State
    Colorado Secretary of State TRACER page for the issue committee Vote Common Sense, formed to oppose Amendment 85 and eight other measures, showing $495,000.00 in contributions and $81,367.00 in expenditures as of the Sept. 21, 2026 report.
  • People for a Fair ColoradoColorado Secretary of State
    Colorado Secretary of State TRACER committee record for People for a Fair Colorado, a small scale issue committee registered 09/03/2026 whose stated purpose lists Initiative 234 (Amendment 85) among eleven initiatives it is organizing to oppose.
Text of the measure

Be it enacted by the People of the state of Colorado: SECTION 1. In Colorado Constitution Article V, Section 1, add (5.6) as follows: (5.6) BALLOT QUESTIONS SHALL BE IN PLAIN LANGUAGE AT NO MORE THAN AN EIGHTH-GRADE READING LEVEL. NO STATUTE MAY INTERFERE WITH THIS PROVISION BY MANDATING LANGUAGE PRECEDING, FOLLOWING, OR IN A BALLOT TITLE OF AN INITIATIVE.