The 2026 election is over (November 3). Official results are on the Colorado Secretary of State’s website.
Kim MonsonKim Monson · Colorado Voter's Guide 2026
Proposition
NN
Referred to the November 2026 ballot

Proposition NN: Keeping revenue that would otherwise fund TABOR refunds

Proposition NN would let Colorado keep revenue it would otherwise refund under TABOR. The measure sets no end date for that change. For ten years, at least half the money deposited in the Children’s Account would go to K-12 education and the rest to children’s programs.
Kim's recommendation
NO
Kim's recommendation
NO
Vote No on Prop NN
Kim's Reasoning:

Prop NN is referred to the ballot by the Colorado State Legislature. Approval of Prop NN would basically reroute our TABOR refunds to PBIs (Politicians, Bureaucrats, and Interested Parties) forever. The actual text of the measure is 12 pages long.

Prop NN is disingenuous and dishonest. Under the guise of “for the children” Prop NN is a greedy grab of money that should be returned to “we the people.” The most tried and true way to make life more “affordable” for individuals is through lower taxes, lower fees, fewer rules, fewer regulations, and returning excess taxes collected back to the individuals who worked hard to earn those dollars.

Prop NN is disingenuous and dishonest. Prop NN states that K-12 funding would increase by 2% for ten years and that excess taxes collected above the 2% would be spent on “the children.” This language implies that spending is focused on kids, however, after ten years the excess taxes collected could be spent on anything the state assembly decides. This is a ten year bait and switch.

Prop NN is disingenuous and dishonest. The text states “without raising taxes.” If it is a tax question on the ballot, it is raising taxes. It states “without raising taxes” however if the state is keeping tax money that should be returned to the people, that is a tax increase. The fiscal note estimates that in 2027-28 alone, $521,000,000 that should be returned to Colorado taxpayers would greedily be retained by the state of Colorado. The fiscal note makes no predictions regarding state retention of our TABOR refunds after 2028, however an average of $521 million per year adds up to $5,200,000,000 over ten years that should be returned to the people.

In Chalkbeat’s report on Colorado’s 2026 CMAS results, only 42.2% of Colorado 8th graders are proficient in English Language Arts (ELA) and only 37.8% of Colorado 8th graders are proficient in Math. That means that Colorado’s public education system is letting 57.8% of kids down in ELA learning and failing 62.2% of our children in Math skills.

We as parents, grandparents, and community members care deeply about the education of our children. Most Coloradans think that our kids are learning how to read, write, and do arithmetic so that children can pursue their hopes and dreams, flourish, and be productive citizens in our society. Overall, that is not the case. In Chalkbeat’s report on Colorado’s 2025 CMAS results, only 44.8% of Colorado kids are proficient in English Language Arts (ELA) and only 35.9% of Colorado children are proficient in Math. That means that Colorado’s public education system is letting 55.2% of kids down in ELA learning and failing 64.1% of our children in Math skills.

One has to ask, “What is going on with classroom time if the majority of kids can not read, write, and do math proficiently?” Perhaps in many classrooms, teaching time is spent, both overtly and subtly, on ideological agendas that separate and divide children into groups such as DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion), encourage victimhood through CRT (Critical Race Theory), and negatively affect children’s mental health through SEL (Social Emotional Learning). This spring I personally witnessed a Colorado high school classroom that had no American flag in the classroom but had a large Pride flag with “Ally” printed on it to affirm the Pride agenda and encourage straight students to “ally” with the agenda. Instead of focusing on hedonism when kids walk into a classroom every day, our students should focus daily on reading, writing, math, history, civics, liberty, skills, and personal responsibility so that our kids have the tools to go after their hopes and dreams.

Most Coloradans support great teachers and want them to be paid accordingly. A report by USAFacts reported that in the 2022-2023 school year, $15,700,000,000 in funding went to Colorado schools with an average of $18,000 spent on each student. That extrapolates to $360,000 for a class of 20 students. That’s a lot of money. We currently have the resources to pay good teachers well.

Instead of focusing on the pursuit of hedonism when kids walk into a classroom every day, our students should focus daily on reading, writing, math, history, civics, liberty, skills, and personal responsibility so that our kids have the tools to pursue their happiness and go after their hopes and dreams.

Before we vote for any new education funding, we must understand where all this money is going, have a clear record of bloated administrative costs and spending, and demand educational results for each and every child. VOTE NO ON PROP NN.

Kim Monson
Kim Monson
Host, The Kim Monson Show · President, Colorado Union of Taxpayers · Colorado Voter's Guide 2026
Certified ballot question
Certified ballot question

Shall state investment in K-12 public education increase two percent each year for the next ten years, with investments used to increase teacher pay, improve teacher retention, lower class sizes, and increase access to career and technical courses, without raising taxes but instead funded by raising the annual limit on state fiscal year spending only by the amount spent on public K-12 education as a voter-approved revenue change, and requiring an annual publicly released, independent audit to show how the new investments are spent?

A yes vote means

Colorado can retain revenue above the current TABOR limit, up to that limit plus the highest prior annual K-12 spending from the funding sources specified in the measure. The final fiscal note estimates TABOR refunds $329.9 million lower in fiscal year 2026–27 and $521.0 million lower in 2027–28. Homestead property-tax reimbursements for local governments are paid first starting in 2027–28. Remaining retained revenue funds K-12 education and children’s programs for ten years, through 2035–36. Beginning in 2036–37, the required K-12 allocation continues, and the legislature can use the remaining money for other purposes. The K-12 increase follows the measure’s cumulative 2-percent foundation-funding formula and is limited by the retained revenue available after applicable homestead reimbursements. If Proposition 137 also passes, the amount retained and spent under Proposition NN may be reduced or eliminated.

A no vote means

Colorado continues to refund revenue above the Referendum C cap, its current revenue limit, under existing law.

Key facts
First fiscal year affected
2026-27, beginning July 1, 2026
TABOR refunds
Reduced by an estimated $329.9 million in FY 2026-27
Tax rates
Unchanged
Expiration

The state’s permission to keep additional revenue has no end date. The required division of the Children’s Account between K-12 education and other children’s programs ends after fiscal year 2035-36.

Revenue limit

Voter approval would raise the amount Colorado may keep above the Referendum C cap.

Estimated reduction in refunds

$329.9 million in fiscal year 2026-27; $521.0 million in 2027-28.

The measure01

Proposition NN would raise Colorado’s revenue limit

Proposition NN would allow Colorado to keep revenue it would otherwise refund under the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights, or TABOR. The measure would raise the state’s current revenue limit, known as the Referendum C cap, by an amount tied to state public education funding.

Approval would constitute a voter-approved revenue change: voters would authorize the state to retain and spend that additional revenue.

Sponsors of Senate Bill 26-135

The General Assembly placed Proposition NN on the ballot through Senate Bill 26-135. Senators Jeff Bridges and Cathy Kipp and Representatives Jennifer Bacon and Meghan Lukens, all Democrats, were its prime sponsors. NN would let the state keep money otherwise due as TABOR refunds, making the sponsors’ record on taxpayer protections relevant to their request. The Colorado Union of Taxpayers (CUT) rates how often legislators vote with its positions on taxes, spending, TABOR and other issues, including property and parental rights. These consistently low percentages show that the sponsors usually voted against CUT’s positions across the years shown. The ratings cover more than TABOR alone. Kim Monson is CUT’s president.

Colorado Union of Taxpayers ratings of the sponsors (%)
Jeff BridgesCathy KippJennifer BaconMeghan Lukens
20215.46.46.2—
20226.96.57.3—
202310121313
20249101011
202513101516
202617.519.815.116.8
Source: Colorado Union of Taxpayers annual ratings.
Key terms
TABORThe Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights, Article X, section 20 of Colorado’s constitution. It limits the revenue the state may keep and requires refunds above the applicable limit.
Referendum C capColorado’s current limit on the revenue subject to TABOR that the state may keep.
Voter-approved revenue changeVoters’ permission for the state to keep and spend revenue above its existing limit. Approval of Proposition NN would grant that permission for the additional revenue covered by the measure.
Six-tier sales tax refundOne of Colorado’s three TABOR refund mechanisms. Refund amounts vary across six income tiers and by filing status. The historical table shows the amounts for tax years 2024 and 2025.
Homestead property tax exemptionA property tax exemption for eligible seniors, veterans with a disability and Gold Star spouses. The state reimburses local governments for the property tax revenue they lose. Under current law, those reimbursements count toward TABOR refunds in a year following one in which revenue exceeded the Referendum C cap.
Positive factorThe additional school payment created by the measure. The statewide formula adds 2% of the preceding year’s program foundation to the preceding year’s positive factor through 2035-36. The first year starts with 2% of the 2025-26 foundation. Actual payments depend on available revenue.
Program foundationThe funding amount used to calculate the positive factor. It begins as the state share of school funding. After the new school-finance formula is fully implemented, it becomes statewide total program funding under that formula.
Supplement and not supplantAdd to existing school funding rather than replace it. The measure applies this requirement to the money appropriated or transferred for its two percent K-12 public education increase.
Categorical programsState funding for specific school programs, as defined in section 22-55-102(4) of the Colorado Revised Statutes. The measure counts this funding alongside the state share of school finance when calculating the additional revenue limit.
Children’s AccountThe General Fund account the measure would create to receive retained revenue after applicable homestead property tax reimbursements. Those reimbursements come first starting in fiscal year 2027-28.
Sources: enrolled Senate Bill 26-135 and the Legislative Council Staff fiscal note of August 10, 2026.
Proposition 137
Proposition 137 (Initiative 308) is on the same ballot

Proposition 137 (Initiative 308) would also let the state keep revenue above the TABOR limit. Proposition NN keeps revenue the state would otherwise have been required to refund and directs it to public education; Proposition 137 (Initiative 308) makes the state sales tax collected on sporting goods a voter-approved revenue change and directs it to conservation and wildfire programs. Each is a separate vote, and neither depends on the other.

Read the guide on Proposition 137 (Initiative 308)
The certified texts of Proposition NN and Proposition 137 (Initiative 308).
The money02

TABOR refunds would fall by $329.9 million in 2026-27 and $521.0 million in 2027-28

The Legislative Council Staff fiscal note estimates that Proposition NN would eliminate the TABOR refunds otherwise expected for fiscal years 2026-27 and 2027-28: $329.9 million and $521.0 million. The measure would not change tax rates.

The estimate covers three ways Colorado returns excess revenue: property tax reimbursements, a temporary income tax rate reduction and the six-tier sales tax refund. The fiscal note projects the changes shown below.

The fiscal note estimates that the new limit would allow Colorado to keep up to $4.6 billion above the Referendum C cap in fiscal year 2026-27 and $4.8 billion in 2027-28. Those figures are limits, not forecasts of collections. The amount kept would depend on actual revenue.

The note gives two different estimates for education funding in 2026-27: $4.7 billion in its Assumptions section and $4.8 billion in its TABOR Refunds section. The $4.8 billion retention limit above follows the latter section.

The fiscal note’s revenue forecast covers only the first two years. It provides no estimate of later TABOR refund reductions.

Table 1C
The fiscal note's Table 1C: the three refund mechanisms and the estimated reduction in each for FY 2026-27 and FY 2027-28.
FY 2026-27FY 2027-28
Property Tax Refunds
-$206.1 million
-$213.2 million
Income Tax Rate Reduction
$0
-$148.7 million
Six-tier Sales Tax Refund
-$123.9 million
-$159.1 million
Net Change in TABOR Refunds
-$329.9 million
-$521.0 million
Source: Legislative Council Staff fiscal note, Table 1C.
Proposition NN: Key facts and dates
Ballot referral: The General Assembly placed Proposition NN on the ballot through Senate Bill 26-135.
Prime sponsors: Senators Jeff Bridges and Cathy Kipp and Representatives Jennifer Bacon and Meghan Lukens, all Democrats.
Legislative votes: The House passed Senate Bill 26-135 on third reading by 42–21 on May 9, 2026. The Senate repassed it with the House amendments by 23–12 on May 12. Across those final-passage votes, 65 legislators voted yes and 33 voted no.
Effective date and first fiscal year: If voters approve the measure, it takes effect when the governor proclaims the result, within 30 days after the official canvass. It applies to fiscal year 2026-27, which began July 1, 2026.
Estimated refund reductions: $329.9 million in fiscal year 2026-27 and $521.0 million in 2027-28.
Additional revenue limit: Up to $4.6 billion above the Referendum C cap in 2026-27 and $4.8 billion in 2027-28. The amount retained depends on actual revenue.
Tax rates and collections: The measure changes how much collected revenue the state may keep. It does not change tax rates; the fiscal note projects no change in revenue collections.
State staffing: The fiscal note projects no additional state staff in either year.
Education-funding estimate: The fiscal note estimates $4.6 billion for 2025-26. For 2026-27, it gives $4.7 billion in its Assumptions section and $4.8 billion in its TABOR Refunds section. The latter figure underlies its $4.8 billion additional revenue limit for 2027-28.
Spending in 2027-28: $206.1 million for homestead property tax reimbursements; $218.8 million for the positive factor; $15.2 million for other K-12 education; $234.0 million for children’s programs; and $20,000 for the State Auditor.
Transfer from general government purposes: $153.1 million in each of 2026-27 and 2027-28 would move to the Children’s Account because of the measure’s interaction with House Bill 26-1419.
Duration: Permission to retain additional revenue has no end date. The required division of the Children’s Account between K-12 education and other children’s programs ends after 2035-36. Homestead reimbursements continue; the fiscal note says positive-factor payments continue if sufficient account revenue is available.
The fiscal note's Assumptions section estimates state public education funding at $4.6 billion in FY 2025-26 and $4.7 billion in FY 2026-27. Its TABOR Refunds section gives $4.6 billion and $4.8 billion for the same two years, and sets the retention ceiling from those figures.
Figures from the Legislative Council Staff final fiscal note for Senate Bill 26-135, August 10, 2026, and from the enrolled act.
$153.1 million a year moves out of general government purposes and into the Children's Account

Table 2 of the fiscal note shows general government purposes falling by $153.1 million in each of FY 2026-27 and FY 2027-28. Table 1B shows the same amount leaving the General Fund and entering the Children's Account, a net change of zero. The fiscal note attributes the shift to the measure's interaction with House Bill 26-1419: "Because voter approval of SB 26-135 would cause HB 26-1419 not to take effect in FY 2026-27 and FY 2027-28, SB 26-135 reduces the amount available to spend or save from the General Fund by $153.1 million in FY 2026-27 and FY 2027-28."

Legislative Council Staff fiscal note for Senate Bill 26-135, August 10, 2026, Tables 1B and 2 and the State Diversions section.
Key dates for Proposition NN
July 1, 2026The first affected fiscal year begins. This is not the measure’s enactment date.
November 3, 2026Voters decide Proposition NN.
After voter approvalThe measure takes effect when the governor proclaims the result, within 30 days after the official canvass.
Fiscal year 2026-27Retained revenue goes to the Children’s Account. The fiscal note estimates a $329.9 million reduction in TABOR refunds.
By January 15, 2027Legislative Council Staff first determine the education-funding amount used to set the additional revenue limit. Later determinations occur on or after July 1 and before August 1 each year.
August 1, 2027Local education providers begin publishing positive-factor spending online for free public access in a downloadable and sortable format.
Fiscal year 2027-28Retained revenue begins funding homestead property tax reimbursements, estimated at $206.1 million. The State Auditor’s annual report receives $20,000.
Fiscal year 2035-36The positive factor reaches its final scheduled increase: 2% of the 2034-35 program foundation plus the 2034-35 positive factor.
July 1, 2036The required division of the Children’s Account between K-12 education and other children’s programs ends.
Fiscal year 2036-37 onwardHomestead reimbursements continue. The fiscal note says positive-factor payments continue if the account has sufficient revenue. The legislature determines how to spend the remainder. Retention authority continues without an end date.
The act sets an end for the spending instructions and none for the retention authority.
Sources: enrolled Senate Bill 26-135, sections 22-54-103.7, 22-44-304, 24-77-302, 24-77-303 and 9; Legislative Council Staff fiscal note, August 10, 2026.

The retained money goes to property tax reimbursements, schools and children's programs

How the retained revenue would be spent

For fiscal years 2026-27 through 2035-36, at least half the money deposited in the Children’s Account would go to K-12 education. The remainder would fund programs supporting children, with priority for child care, full-day preschool and school readiness. Some seniors, veterans with a disability and Gold Star spouses receive a property tax exemption, and the state must repay local governments the property tax they lose because of it. Under current law, in a year after the state collected more than its Referendum C cap, that repayment counts as a way of refunding the surplus; otherwise it is paid from other state money. Under Proposition NN, starting in 2027-28, the repayment would come first out of the revenue the state keeps, an estimated $206.1 million that year, and only what remains would go to the Children's Account.

The fiscal note estimates $483.0 million in retained revenue in 2026-27 and $674.1 million in 2027-28. Those amounts exceed the projected refund reductions by $153.1 million each year. Under House Bill 26-1419, that $153.1 million would otherwise be available for general government purposes. Proposition NN would direct it to the Children’s Account instead.

The expenditure table shows the resulting increases and decreases in spending. Its net totals are $329.9 million and $521.0 million; they are not the total revenue retained.

Table title: Estimated changes in state spending Total row: Net increase in state spending

How the additional school payments are calculated

The measure creates an additional school payment called the positive factor. Districts could use it only to increase teacher pay, improve teacher retention, reduce class sizes and expand access to career and technical courses. The payment must add to existing school funding rather than replace it.

For 2026-27, the statewide positive factor equals 2% of the previous year’s program foundation. Each year through 2035-36 adds 2% of the preceding year’s foundation to the previous positive factor. The formula stops increasing after 2035-36.

Program foundation initially means the state share of school funding. Once the new school-finance formula is fully implemented, it means statewide total program funding under that formula.

A district’s share is its proportion of statewide funding under the fully implemented new formula, multiplied by the statewide amount available for this increase. That amount is capped at the positive factor or the revenue available after the applicable homestead reimbursements, whichever is less. Homestead reimbursements are deducted starting in 2027-28.

The fiscal note estimates positive-factor payments of $107.4 million in 2026-27 and $218.8 million in 2027-28. Appendix A gives district estimates.

A district’s positive-factor payment is separate from its total program funding and is distributed in the same form and manner as total program payments. These payments must supplement and not supplant total program: they add to existing funding rather than replace it.

Beginning August 1, 2027, local education providers must publish their actual positive-factor spending online for free public access in a downloadable and sortable format.

Six-tier sales tax refunds for tax years 2024 and 2025
Six-tier sales tax refunds for tax years 2024 and 2025
Tax year 2025
Income tier (modified adjusted gross income)Single filerJoint filers
$52,000 or less$19$38
$52,001 – $105,000$25$50
$105,001 – $168,000$29$58
$168,001 – $233,000$35$70
$233,001 – $299,000$37$74
$299,001 or more$59$118
Tax year 2024
Income tier (modified adjusted gross income)Single filerJoint filers
$53,000 or less$177$354
$53,001 – $105,000$240$480
$105,001 – $166,000$277$554
$166,001 – $233,000$323$646
$233,001 – $302,000$350$700
$302,001 or more$565$1,130
Modified adjusted gross income is federal adjusted gross income plus nontaxable Social Security income and nontaxable state and local bond interest, as the Department of Revenue's individual income tax booklet defines it for the refund table.
These historical amounts are not estimates of refunds lost under Proposition NN.
Source: Colorado Department of Revenue individual income tax booklets, tax years 2024 and 2025.
The ballot question and the act describe the audit in different words

The question voters will read requires "an annual publicly released, independent audit to show how the new investments are spent". The act's audit section is headed "Excess state revenues expenditure independent audit" and says "THE STATE AUDITOR SHALL REPORT ON EXCESS STATE REVENUES", including the amount the state retained and spent above the limit and a description of how it spent that money. The words "publicly released" appear in the act only inside the ballot title printed in its final section. The act separately requires each local education provider to post its positive factor spending online from August 1, 2027. The fiscal note estimates $20,000 a year in the Office of the State Auditor beginning in FY 2027-28 for a contractor to prepare the report.

Sources: certified ballot question; enrolled Senate Bill 26-135, sections 24-77-304, 22-44-304 and 9; Legislative Council Staff fiscal note, August 10, 2026.
Measure provisions03

Colorado could keep additional revenue after 2036

Proposition NN sets no end date for the state’s permission to keep additional revenue, called its retention authority.

The required division of the Children’s Account between K-12 education and other children’s programs ends after fiscal year 2035-36. The fiscal note says the state would continue paying homestead property tax reimbursements first. School districts would continue receiving positive-factor payments if the account has sufficient revenue. The legislature would decide how to spend the remaining money.

The positive factor reaches its final scheduled increase in 2035-36. Its formula remains at that amount in later years, although payments still depend on available revenue.

The State Auditor would report how the money was spent

The ballot question calls for “an annual publicly released, independent audit to show how the new investments are spent”. Section 24-77-304, titled “Excess state revenues expenditure independent audit”, requires the State Auditor to report the amount retained and how it was spent. The fiscal note budgets $20,000 a year from 2027-28 for a contractor to prepare that report.

The phrase “publicly released” appears in the enrolled act only in the ballot question. Separately, the act requires local education providers to publish their positive-factor spending online, in a downloadable and sortable format, beginning August 1, 2027.

Because Brighter Colorado’s registration covers eight measures, the six it supports and the two it opposes, its totals cannot be attributed to Proposition NN alone.

Colorado could keep additional revenue indefinitely

The state’s permission to keep additional revenue has no end date. The required division between K-12 education and other children’s programs ends after fiscal year 2035-36. Homestead property tax reimbursements continue, and the fiscal note says school payments continue if the Children’s Account has sufficient revenue.

The committees' organization money by source
Yes for Colorado Kids reports $2,063,516.55 from organizations in 16 filings. The largest: Gary Advocacy LLC $1,000,000 in 2 filings; Colorado Fund for Children & Public Education $950,000 in 3 filings; McCandless Truck Center $35,000.
The filings record no organization contributions to People for a Fair Colorado. Contributions from individuals are outside this view.
Brighter Colorado reports $295,000 from organizations in 3 filings. The largest: Common Sense America $250,000; Rado Capital $25,000; Advance Colorado $20,000. Because its registration covers several measures, none of these amounts can be attributed to Proposition NN alone.
Affordable Colorado reports $3,426.20 from organizations in 3 filings. The largest: Independence Institute $3,426.20 in 3 filings. Because its registration covers several measures, none of these amounts can be attributed to Proposition NN alone.
The filings record no organization contributions to Let's Go Colorado. Contributions from individuals are outside this view.
TRACER filing, October 3, 2026.
The enrolled act's own words
MAY RETAIN AND SPEND STATE REVENUES THAT THE STATE OTHERWISE WOULD HAVE BEEN REQUIRED TO REFUND
Senate Bill 26-135, section 24-77-302 (1)
A DISTRICT SHALL ONLY EXPEND ITS POSITIVE FACTOR TO: (a) INCREASE TEACHER PAY; (b) IMPROVE TEACHER RETENTION; (c) LOWER CLASS SIZES; AND (d) INCREASE ACCESS TO CAREER AND TECHNICAL COURSES.
Senate Bill 26-135, section 22-54-103.7 (6)
The act states that "Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law".
Estimated changes in state spending
FY 2026-27FY 2027-28
General government purposes-$153.1 million-$153.1 million
Property tax reimbursements$0$206.1 million
K-12 education, positive factor$107.4 million$218.8 million
K-12 education, other$134.1 million$15.2 million
Programs that support children$241.5 million$234.0 million
Office of the State Auditor$0$20,000
Net increase in state spending$329.9 million$521.0 million
The fiscal note gives one total for programs that support children. The act directs that money to "PROGRAMS THAT SUPPORT COLORADO'S CHILDREN, PRIORITIZING CHILD CARE, FULL-DAY PRESCHOOL, AND OTHER PROGRAMS THAT PREPARE CHILDREN TO BE SUCCESSFUL IN SCHOOL".
The table shows the fiscal note's estimates. The retention ceiling is separate: up to $4.6 billion in FY 2026-27 and $4.8 billion in FY 2027-28.
The positive factor's path to a school district
The first yearFor the 2026-27 budget year the positive factor is "TWO PERCENT OF PROGRAM FOUNDATION CALCULATED FOR THE 2025-26 BUDGET YEAR".
GrowthFor the 2027-28 through 2034-35 budget years it is two percent of program foundation for the immediately preceding budget year plus the positive factor for that same preceding year, so each year's amount carries the previous year's forward.
The cap on growthFor the 2035-36 budget year and each budget year after it, the act fixes the calculation at two percent of program foundation for the 2034-35 budget year plus the positive factor for the 2034-35 budget year.
The term program foundationThe act defines program foundation as the state share of total program for budget years before total program is determined under the new school finance formula, and as the new formula statewide total program calculation after that.
A district's shareThe act sets a district's share as its new formula district total program calculation divided by the new formula statewide total program calculation, multiplied by the two percent K-12 public education increase. The act defines that increase as the lesser of the current budget year's positive factor and the amount the state may retain for the year after the treasurer's homestead exemption warrants are paid. The fiscal note describes the multiplier as "the total amount of the positive factor".
It sits on top of the district's total programThe act says a district's positive factor "IS IN ADDITION TO, BUT IS NOT INCLUDED IN, THE DISTRICT'S TOTAL PROGRAM", and requires it to be distributed in the same form and manner as total program payments.
Permitted spendingA district may spend its positive factor only to increase teacher pay, improve teacher retention, lower class sizes and increase access to career and technical courses.
It adds to school funding rather than replacing itThe act says the money the General Assembly appropriates or transfers for the two percent K-12 public education increase "SHALL SUPPLEMENT AND NOT SUPPLANT TOTAL PROGRAM".
Required publicationFrom August 1, 2027 each local education provider must post its actual positive factor spending "IN A FORMAT THAT CAN BE DOWNLOADED AND SORTED, FOR FREE PUBLIC ACCESS".
The totalThe fiscal note estimates positive factor distributions of $107.4 million in FY 2026-27 and $218.8 million in FY 2027-28, paid from the Children's Account in the General Fund.
The fiscal note gives the statewide amount. It says the estimated amount for each school district appears in its Appendix A.
Sources: enrolled Senate Bill 26-135, sections 22-54-103.7, 24-77-302 and 22-44-304; Legislative Council Staff fiscal note, August 10, 2026.
Proposition NN's effect on TABOR refunds
Change in TABOR refunds
FY 2026-27
-$329.9 million
FY 2027-28
-$521.0 million
Most the state could keep above the Referendum C cap
FY 2026-27
$4.6 billion
FY 2027-28
$4.8 billion
The amount that will actually be retained depends on the amount of revenue collected.
The fiscal note's estimates cover the first two years of the ten-year program.
Source: Legislative Council Staff final fiscal note for Senate Bill 26-135, August 10, 2026: Tables 1, 1C and 2 and the TABOR Refunds section.
Campaign support and opposition04
For
Against
TRACER filing, October 28, 2026
From the show05
Show coverage
The Kim Monson Show
Newsroom coverage
Sources06
Official documents
Further reading
Official documents
  • 2026 State Ballot Information BookletColorado Legislative Council · Sep 24, 2026
    This is the Colorado Legislative Council's 2026 ballot information booklet analysis of Proposition NN, which explains that the measure lets the state keep revenue otherwise refunded under TABOR for K-12 education and children's programs, and estimates it would reduce refunds by $329.9 million in 2026-27 and $521.0 million in 2027-28.
  • The Colorado General Assembly's Legislative Council ballot-analysis index page for Proposition NN (2026, statutory), giving its short title 'Keep and Spend Money for Education and Other Purposes', research staff and draft deadlines.
  • The final Legislative Council Staff fiscal note (August 10, 2026) for SB 26-135, which it says was referred to voters as Proposition NN.
  • Official documentColorado General Assembly
    The enrolled text of Senate Bill 26-135, the legislature's referral that lets the state keep revenue above the TABOR limit (otherwise refunded) equal to state K-12 education funding, sets a two percent yearly K-12 increase for ten years, and sends the question to voters on November 3, 2026.
Reference
News coverage
Show 3 more
Policy analysis
Campaigns and committees
  • Let's Go ColoradoColorado Secretary of State · Aug 17, 2026
    Colorado Secretary of State TRACER committee detail page for the issue committee Let's Go Colorado, whose registered purpose is to oppose Amendment 87, Proposition NN and Ballot Issue 7A, and whose filed reports through September 16, 2026 show no contributions or spending.
  • Affordable ColoradoColorado Secretary of State · Aug 14, 2026
    The Colorado Secretary of State's TRACER committee detail page for Affordable Colorado, a statewide issue committee registered 08/14/2026 whose stated purpose includes opposing Proposition NN, with a financial summary current through the report filed 09/21/2026.
  • Yes for Colorado KidsColorado Secretary of State · May 14, 2026
  • Brighter ColoradoColorado Secretary of State
    The Colorado Secretary of State TRACER record for Brighter Colorado, a statewide issue committee registered July 6, 2026 whose stated purpose includes opposing Proposition NN, reporting $306,625 in contributions and $35,488.90 in expenditures as of the September 21, 2026 report.
  • People for a Fair ColoradoColorado Secretary of State
    Colorado Secretary of State TRACER committee-detail page for People for a Fair Colorado, a small scale issue committee registered 09/03/2026 whose stated purpose includes organizing in favor of Prop NN.
Text of the enrolled act

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado: SECTION 1. Legislative declaration. (1) The general assembly finds and declares that: ________ Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law; dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act. (a) Public education is the bedrock of Colorado's democracy, fundamental to individual opportunity, the underpinning of thriving communities, and the key to Colorado's economic prosperity and future; (b) Wise and adequate investment in Colorado's schools is essential to maintaining and improving the competitiveness of Colorado and its students; (c) The money invested in Colorado's public schools has a return on investment that has long been recognized as among the nation's highest; (d) An increase in the rates of K-12 graduation, the earning of industry certifications, and the earning of associates degrees demonstrate the effectiveness of Colorado's investment in public schools; (e) Research demonstrates that increasing school funding results in long-term increases in graduation rates and lifetime wages, prevents crime, and lowers incarceration rates; (f) Educators and support staff in every school district and charter school across Colorado make invaluable contributions to their schools, districts, and communities by dedicating their time, talents, and out-of-pocket money to their students, despite Colorado ranking near the bottom of starting teacher pay and having the largest teacher pay penalty in the nation; (g) Teachers, counselors, para professionals, bus drivers, and essential support staff are leaving their professions because salaries have not kept up with housing, healthcare, and cost of living; (h) Students are learning in overcrowded classrooms and in schools with fewer mental health counselors, opportunities for special education support, and programs that support their ability to develop into healthy, productive adults; (i) Working class, multilingual, and rural communities are hit hardest by chronic school underfunding; (j) In January 2025, the legislature received the reports and recommendation of the two commissioned adequacy studies: "Equity and Adequacy of Colorado School Funding - A Cost-Modeling Approach", by the American institutes for research, and "Colorado Input-Based Financial Adequacy Study Report", by Augenblick, Palaich and Associates, Inc; (k) The adequacy studies found that, were Colorado schools funded fully and fairly, every student would have the individual attention they need from teachers, counselors, health professionals, tutors, and support staff to succeed and thrive; every teacher would have a reasonable workload, professional development and coaching, and a salary that would allow them to live where they work; and every community would enjoy the benefit of vibrant public schools, a high-quality workforce, and an engaged citizenry; (l) Colorado's fiscal constraints and potential of federal funding cuts to education, medicaid, nutrition, human services, and other critical programs threaten the sustainability and adequacy of school funding in Colorado and to deplete the state education fund; (m) Research demonstrates that high-quality early childhood education, including child care and preschool, produces significant long-term benefits, including improved school readiness, higher graduation rates, and greater lifetime earnings, and that every dollar invested in high-quality childhood education yields substantial returns to the state and its communities; (n) Children who participate in high-quality preschool and child care programs arrive in kindergarten better prepared to learn across language, math, and social-emotional domains, with the greatest benefits accruing to children from working families, rural communities, and multilingual households; and (o) Therefore, it is in the best interest of educators, students, and their families to allow voters to invest further in public education by modernizing the state's ability to retain and spend revenue to meet the needs of Colorado communities and to ensure that state investment in K-12 public education is increased by two percent for at least ten years through the funding of a positive factor. SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add 22-54-103.7 as follows: 22-54-103.7. Positive factor - definitions. (1) AS USED IN THIS SECTION, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES: (a) "NEW FORMULA DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM CALCULATION" MEANS A DISTRICT'S TOTAL PROGRAM FOR THE APPLICABLE BUDGET YEAR AS CALCULATED PURSUANT TO THE DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM FORMULA IN SECTION 22-54-103.5. THE TERM DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY ADJUSTMENTS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SECTION 22-54-103.3 WHEN DETERMINING A DISTRICT'S TOTAL PROGRAM FOR THE 2027-28 BUDGET YEAR THROUGH THE 2030-31 BUDGET YEAR. (b) "NEW FORMULA STATEWIDE TOTAL PROGRAM CALCULATION" MEANS THE DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM FOR ALL DISTRICTS FOR THE APPLICABLE BUDGET YEAR AS CALCULATED PURSUANT TO THE DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM FORMULA IN SECTION 22-54-103.5. THE TERM DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY ADJUSTMENTS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SECTION 22-54-103.3 WHEN DETERMINING A DISTRICT'S TOTAL PROGRAM FOR THE 2027-28 BUDGET YEAR THROUGH THE 2030-31 BUDGET YEAR. (c) "POSITIVE FACTOR" MEANS: (I) FOR THE 2026-27 BUDGET YEAR, TWO PERCENT OF PROGRAM FOUNDATION CALCULATED FOR THE 2025-26 BUDGET YEAR; (II) FOR THE 2027-28 BUDGET YEAR THROUGH THE 2034-35 BUDGET YEAR, THE SUM OF: (A) TWO PERCENT OF PROGRAM FOUNDATION FOR THE IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING BUDGET YEAR; AND (B) THE POSITIVE FACTOR FOR THE IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING BUDGET YEAR; AND (III) FOR THE 2035-36 BUDGET YEAR AND EACH BUDGET YEAR THEREAFTER: (A) TWO PERCENT OF PROGRAM FOUNDATION FOR THE 2034-35 BUDGET YEAR; AND (B) THE POSITIVE FACTOR FOR THE 2034-35 BUDGET YEAR. (d) "PROGRAM FOUNDATION" MEANS: (I) FOR BUDGET YEARS BEFORE TOTAL PROGRAM IS DETERMINED PURSUANT TO SECTION 22-54-103.5, AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO STATE SHARE OF TOTAL PROGRAM; AND (II) FOR BUDGET YEARS WHEN TOTAL PROGRAM IS DETERMINED PURSUANT TO SECTION 22-54-103.5, AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO NEW FORMULA STATEWIDE TOTAL PROGRAM CALCULATION. (e) "STATE SHARE OF TOTAL PROGRAM" MEANS AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE TOTAL OF THE STATE'S SHARE OF EACH SCHOOL DISTRICT'S TOTAL PROGRAM, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 22-55-102 (18). (f) "TWO PERCENT K-12 PUBLIC EDUCATION INCREASE" MEANS AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE LESSER OF: (I) THE POSITIVE FACTOR FOR THE CURRENT BUDGET YEAR; OR (II) THE AMOUNT THAT THE STATE IS AUTHORIZED TO RETAIN AND SPEND PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-77-302 (1) FOR THE BUDGET YEAR MINUS, FOR THE 2027-28 BUDGET YEAR AND EACH BUDGET YEAR THEREAFTER, AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE TOTAL DOLLAR AMOUNTS OF WARRANTS ISSUED BY THE STATE TREASURER PURSUANT TO SECTION 39-3-207 (4) IN THE CURRENT BUDGET YEAR. (2) FOR THE 2026-27 BUDGET YEAR AND EACH BUDGET YEAR THEREAFTER, A DISTRICT'S SHARE OF POSITIVE FACTOR IS EQUAL TO: (NEW FORMULA DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM CALCULATION / NEW FORMULA STATEWIDE TOTAL PROGRAM CALCULATION) X (TWO PERCENT K-12 PUBLIC EDUCATION INCREASE). (3) FOR THE 2026-27 BUDGET YEAR AND EACH BUDGET YEAR THEREAFTER, THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SHALL ANNUALLY CALCULATE EACH DISTRICT'S NEW FORMULA DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM CALCULATION AND THE NEW FORMULA STATEWIDE TOTAL PROGRAM CALCULATION. (4) FOR THE 2026-27 BUDGET YEAR AND EACH BUDGET YEAR THEREAFTER, THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND THE STAFF OF THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL SHALL ANNUALLY DETERMINE EACH DISTRICT'S POSITIVE FACTOR BASED ON BUDGET PROJECTIONS; EXCEPT THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND THE STAFF OF THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL SHALL MAKE MID-YEAR REVISIONS TO REPLACE PROJECTIONS WITH ACTUAL FIGURES TO DETERMINE ANY NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE AMOUNT TO MAINTAIN THE POSITIVE FACTOR FOR THE APPLICABLE BUDGET YEAR. (5) A DISTRICT'S POSITIVE FACTOR IS IN ADDITION TO, BUT IS NOT INCLUDED IN, THE DISTRICT'S TOTAL PROGRAM DETERMINED PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE 54. THE POSITIVE FACTOR MUST BE DISTRIBUTED IN THE SAME FORM AND MANNER IN WHICH PAYMENTS OF TOTAL PROGRAM ARE DISTRIBUTED UNDER LAW TO ALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS. (6) A DISTRICT SHALL ONLY EXPEND ITS POSITIVE FACTOR TO: (a) INCREASE TEACHER PAY; (b) IMPROVE TEACHER RETENTION; (c) LOWER CLASS SIZES; AND (d) INCREASE ACCESS TO CAREER AND TECHNICAL COURSES. SECTION 3. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add part 3 to article 77 of title 24 as follows: PART 3 SUBMISSION OF BALLOT ISSUE VOTER-APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE 24-77-301. Definitions. AS USED IN THIS PART 3, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES: (1) "CHILDREN'S ACCOUNT" OR "ACCOUNT" MEANS THE CHILDREN'S ACCOUNT CREATED IN SECTION 24-77-302 (2). (2) "STATE PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING" MEANS THE AMOUNT DETERMINED BY LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL STAFF PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-77-303 (1). (3) "STATE REVENUES" MEANS STATE FISCAL YEAR SPENDING, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 24-77-102 (17). (4) "TWO PERCENT K-12 PUBLIC EDUCATION INCREASE" HAS THE MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION 22-54-103.7 (1)(f). 24-77-302. Retention of excess state revenues - children's account - definitions. (1) FOR STATE FISCAL YEARS COMMENCING ON OR AFTER JULY 1, 2026, THE STATE MAY RETAIN AND SPEND STATE REVENUES THAT THE STATE OTHERWISE WOULD HAVE BEEN REQUIRED TO REFUND UNDER SECTION 20 (7)(d) OF ARTICLE X OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION IN AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE STATE PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING FOR THE STATE FISCAL YEAR. (2) (a) THERE IS HEREBY CREATED IN THE GENERAL FUND THE CHILDREN'S ACCOUNT, WHICH CONSISTS OF: (I) FOR STATE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27, AN AMOUNT OF MONEY EQUAL TO THE AMOUNT THAT THE STATE RETAINS FOR STATE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (1) OF THIS SECTION; AND (II) FOR STATE FISCAL YEARS COMMENCING ON OR AFTER JULY 1, 2027, AN AMOUNT OF MONEY EQUAL TO THE AMOUNT THAT THE STATE RETAINS FOR THE STATE FISCAL YEAR PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (1) OF THIS SECTION MINUS AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE TOTAL DOLLAR AMOUNT OF WARRANTS ISSUED BY THE STATE TREASURER PURSUANT TO SECTION 39-3-207 (4) IN THE SAME STATE FISCAL YEAR. (b) FOR EACH STATE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING ON OR AFTER JULY 1, 2026, BUT BEFORE JULY 1, 2036, THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY: (I) SHALL TRANSFER OR APPROPRIATE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE TWO PERCENT K-12 PUBLIC EDUCATION INCREASE FOR THE STATE FISCAL YEAR AND THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SHALL DISTRIBUTE THAT AMOUNT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 22-54-103.7; (II) SHALL APPROPRIATE OR TRANSFER AN AMOUNT FOR INVESTMENT IN K-12 PUBLIC EDUCATION, TO BE USED FOR SCHOOL SERVICES, DISABILITY SERVICES TO STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES, AND INCREASING ANNUAL CONTACT HOURS, EQUAL TO THE AMOUNT, IF ANY, BY WHICH ONE HALF OF THE AMOUNT CREDITED TO THE ACCOUNT FOR THE STATE FISCAL YEAR EXCEEDS THE AMOUNT APPROPRIATED OR TRANSFERRED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2)(b)(I) OF THIS SECTION FOR THE STATE FISCAL YEAR; AND (III) AFTER MAKING THE APPROPRIATIONS OR TRANSFERS REQUIRED BY SUBSECTIONS (2)(b)(I) AND (2)(b)(II) OF THIS SECTION FOR THE STATE FISCAL YEAR, SHALL APPROPRIATE OR TRANSFER THE REMAINING MONEY IN THE ACCOUNT TO PROGRAMS THAT SUPPORT COLORADO'S CHILDREN, PRIORITIZING CHILD CARE, FULL-DAY PRESCHOOL, AND OTHER PROGRAMS THAT PREPARE CHILDREN TO BE SUCCESSFUL IN SCHOOL. (3) THE APPROVAL OF THE BALLOT MEASURE INCLUDING THIS SECTION BY A MAJORITY OF THE ELECTORS VOTING ON THE BALLOT MEASURE CONSTITUTES A VOTER-APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE TO ALLOW THE RETENTION AND EXPENDITURE OF THE ADDITIONAL STATE REVENUES THAT THE STATE IS AUTHORIZED TO RETAIN AND SPEND PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (1) OF THIS SECTION. (4) THIS SECTION DOES NOT AFFECT THE AMOUNT THAT THE STATE IS PERMITTED TO RETAIN AND SPEND UNDER THE EXCESS STATE REVENUES CAP, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 24-77-103.6 (6)(b)(I). (5) THE MONEY THAT THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY APPROPRIATES OR TRANSFERS PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2)(b)(I) OF THIS SECTION SHALL SUPPLEMENT AND NOT SUPPLANT TOTAL PROGRAM, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 22-55-102 (18). 24-77-303. Determination of state public education funding. (1) ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 15, 2027, ON OR AFTER JULY 1, 2027, BUT BEFORE AUGUST 1, 2027, AND ON OR AFTER EACH JULY 1 AND BEFORE EACH AUGUST 1 THEREAFTER, LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL STAFF SHALL DETERMINE AND REPORT TO THE STATE CONTROLLER, THE OFFICE OF STATE PLANNING AND BUDGETING, AND THE JOINT BUDGET COMMITTEE, THE GREATEST TOTAL AMOUNT IN A PRECEDING STATE FISCAL YEAR THAT HAS BEEN COUNTED AS STATE FISCAL YEAR SPENDING AND APPROPRIATED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FOR A PRECEDING STATE FISCAL YEAR FOR CATEGORICAL PROGRAMS AND THE STATE SHARE OF TOTAL PROGRAM AND THE AMOUNT OF THE TWO PERCENT K-12 PUBLIC EDUCATION INCREASE FOR THE SAME PRECEDING STATE FISCAL YEAR. THE AMOUNT DETERMINED AND REPORTED BY LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL STAFF PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION (1) IS THE STATE PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING FOR THAT STATE FISCAL YEAR. (2) AS USED IN THIS SECTION, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES: (a) "CATEGORICAL PROGRAMS" HAS THE MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION 22-55-102 (4). (b) "STATE SHARE OF TOTAL PROGRAM" MEANS AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE TOTAL OF THE STATE'S SHARE OF EACH SCHOOL DISTRICT'S TOTAL PROGRAM, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 22-55-102 (18). 24-77-304. Excess state revenues expenditure independent audit. (1) FOR EACH STATE FISCAL YEAR THAT THE STATE RETAINS AND SPENDS STATE REVENUES IN EXCESS OF THE LIMITATION ON STATE FISCAL YEAR SPENDING PURSUANT TO THIS PART 3, THE STATE AUDITOR SHALL REPORT ON EXCESS STATE REVENUES, INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: (a) THE AMOUNT OF STATE REVENUES THAT THE STATE RETAINED AND SPENT IN EXCESS OF THE LIMITATION ON STATE FISCAL YEAR SPENDING PURSUANT TO THIS PART 3; AND (b) A DESCRIPTION OF HOW THE STATE EXPENDED FROM THE ACCOUNT THE STATE REVENUES THAT THE STATE RETAINED AND SPENT IN EXCESS OF THE LIMITATION ON STATE FISCAL YEAR SPENDING PURSUANT TO THIS PART 3. (2) THE STATE AUDITOR SHALL COMPLETE THE REPORTING REQUIRED BY SUBSECTION (1) OF THIS SECTION AT THE SAME TIME THAT THE STATE AUDITOR COMPLETES THE REPORT REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SECTION 2-3-103 (2) FOLLOWING A FISCAL YEAR IN WHICH THE STATE RETAINS AND SPENDS STATE REVENUES IN EXCESS OF THE LIMITATION ON STATE FISCAL YEAR SPENDING PURSUANT TO THIS PART 3 AND MAY AMEND THE REPORT THEREAFTER AS NECESSARY. SECTION 4. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 22-44-304, add (1)(g) as follows: 22-44-304. Financial reporting - online access to information - definitions. (1) (g) (I) ADDITIONALLY, COMMENCING ON AUGUST 1, 2027, EACH LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 22-54-202, SHALL POST IN A FORMAT THAT CAN BE DOWNLOADED AND SORTED, FOR FREE PUBLIC ACCESS, THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER'S ACTUAL EXPENDITURES OF ANY POSITIVE FACTOR RECEIVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 22-54-103.7. (II) AS USED IN THIS SUBSECTION (1)(g), UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES, "POSITIVE FACTOR" HAS THE MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION 22-54-103.7 (1)(c). SECTION 5. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-77-106.5, amend (1)(b) as follows: 24-77-106.5. Annual financial report - certification of excess state revenues. (1) (b) Notwithstanding section 24-1-136 (11)(a)(I), based upon the financial report prepared in accordance with subsection (1)(a) of this section for any given fiscal year, the controller shall certify to the governor, the general assembly, and the executive director of the department of revenue no later than September 1 following the end of a fiscal year the amount of state revenues in excess of the limitation on state fiscal year spending imposed by section 20 (7)(a) of article X of the state constitution, if any, for such fiscal year and the state revenues in excess of such limitation that the state is authorized to retain and spend pursuant to voter approval of section 24-77-103.6 AND PART 3 OF THIS ARTICLE 77. SECTION 6. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 29-32-104, amend (5) as follows: 29-32-104. Permissible expenditures - affordable housing programs - report - definitions. (5) If the Legislative Council Staff's March Economic and Revenue Forecast in any given year projects revenue for the next state fiscal year will fall below the revenue limit imposed under section 20 of article X of the state constitution BY AN AMOUNT GREATER THAN THE AMOUNT OF STATE PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING AS DEFINED IN SECTION 24-77-301 (2), the general assembly may reduce the funding allocated to the office required by this section for the next state fiscal year in order to balance the state budget for said state fiscal year. SECTION 7. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 39-22-123.5, amend (3.5)(a)(VIII) as follows: 39-22-123.5. Earned income tax credit - legislative declaration - repeal. (3.5) (a) As used in this subsection (3.5), unless the context otherwise requires: (VIII) "Nonexempt revenue" means, for the applicable state fiscal year, the revenues that are identified as nonexempt revenues in the annual comprehensive financial report published by the office of the state controller; EXCEPT THAT, FOR STATE FISCAL YEARS COMMENCING ON OR AFTER JULY 1, 2026, NONEXEMPT REVENUE INCLUDES STATE PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING AS DEFINED IN SECTION 24-77-301 (2). SECTION 8. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 39-22-130, amend (2)(b)(II)(G) as follows: 39-22-130. Family affordability tax credit - tax preference performance statement - legislative declaration - definitions - repeal. (2) As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires: (b) (II) As used in this subsection (2)(b): (G) "Nonexempt revenue" means, for the applicable state fiscal year, the revenue that is identified as nonexempt TABOR revenues in the annual comprehensive financial report published by the office of the state controller; EXCEPT THAT, FOR STATE FISCAL YEARS COMMENCING ON OR AFTER JULY 1, 2026, NONEXEMPT REVENUE INCLUDES STATE PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING AS DEFINED IN SECTION 24-77-301 (2). SECTION 9. Refer to people under referendum. At the election held on November 3, 2026, the secretary of state shall submit this act by its ballot title to the registered electors of the state for their approval or rejection. Each elector voting at the election may cast a vote either "Yes/For" or "No/Against" on the following ballot title: "Shall state investment in K-12 public education increase two percent each year for the next ten years, with investments used to increase teacher pay, improve teacher retention, lower class sizes, and increase access to career and technical courses, without raising taxes but instead funded by raising the annual limit on state fiscal year spending only by the amount spent on public K-12 education as a voter-approved revenue change, and requiring an annual publicly released, independent audit to show how the new investments are spent?" Except as otherwise provided in section 1-40-123, Colorado Revised Statutes, if a majority of the electors voting on the ballot title vote "Yes/For", then the act will become part of the Colorado Revised Statutes. ____________________________ James Rashad Coleman, Sr. PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE ____________________________ Julie McCluskie SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________________________ Esther van Mourik SECRETARY OF THE SENATE ____________________________ Vanessa Reilly CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

The 2026 election is over. Requests for personalized guides closed on November 3, 2026. The full guide remains available to read.

Read the full guide