City policy under Section 5-1 of the charter is to conduct government business in public "to the greatest extent feasible." Section 5-2 limits the City Council's executive sessions to four subjects: information that federal or state law requires to be kept confidential; personnel matters, chiefly those of employees the council appoints directly; appraisals and strategy for buying or selling water rights and real property; and consultation with the city's attorney on pending litigation, including a lawsuit the person requesting the session believes in good faith may result. Boards, commissions, task forces and committees may meet in executive session only on pending litigation, under procedures consistent with the council's. Section 5-4 provides that where the charter and state or federal law address the same matter, the provision that best preserves open government prevails.
Louisville Executive Sessions on More Topics
Every subject Louisville officials may discuss in private sits in the charter, so the list grows only when the city's electors amend it. The amendment ties the council's list to the Colorado Open Meetings Law "as amended," and each later change to that law reaches Louisville with no local vote.
The amendment also releases the appointed boards from the council's safeguards in Section 5-3 and leaves their procedures and limits to a council ordinance. The charter pairs its short list with a policy of conducting city business in public wherever feasible and a rule that the more open provision governs where it and state law overlap. I oppose trading that list for one written outside Louisville.
I recommend a no vote on City of Louisville ballot question 2C.

Charter Amendment Expanding Executive Session Topics
Shall the City of Louisville Home Rule Charter be amended to authorize the City Council to convene executive sessions for the purpose of considering any matter authorized by the Colorado Open Meetings Law, C.R.S. § 24-6-401, et seq., as amended, and for boards, commissions, task forces, and committees to convene executive sessions pursuant to the Colorado Open Meetings Law in accordance with procedures and subject to limitations established by ordinance, thereby expanding the topics for executive sessions currently permitted under the Charter?
Expands executive-session topics to those authorized by the Colorado Open Meetings Law and permits the other listed bodies to use them under ordinance procedures and limits.
Rejects the proposed expansion of executive-session authority in the charter.
The council referred 2C to voters in Ordinance No. 1929, Series 2026, with its public hearing and second reading set for July 21. Question 2C strikes the four-subject list and allows an executive session for "any matter authorized by the Colorado Open Meetings Law ... as amended." City staff summarized the state's topics for the council: the purchase, lease or sale of any property interest; legal advice on specific legal questions; matters kept confidential by law; security arrangements and investigations; strategy and instructions for negotiations; personnel matters, with stated exceptions; and documents the Colorado Open Records Act bars from disclosure. Because the charter adopts the state law "as amended," the Louisville list follows every later change to that law.
The ordinance says the present limits "have, at times, led to significant challenges to City staff in properly advising and informing City Council on topics that may be premature to discuss in an open meeting."
At second reading the council rewrote the rule for boards, commissions, task forces and committees. Each may convene an executive session under the state law "in accordance with procedures and subject to any limitations as may be established by Ordinance." The amendment deletes the requirement that their procedures be consistent with Section 5-3, which for the council requires a two-thirds vote of the entire council on each topic, an attorney's opinion on the session's propriety and a recording. Staff told the council the change lets it tailor topics and procedures to each body. Question 2C does not amend Sections 5-1, 5-3 or 5-4, and Question 2H changes only pronouns in Section 5-3.
The amendment takes effect only if a majority votes yes on November 3. Changing the charter's list takes an amendment submitted to a vote of the city's registered electors.
- City Council Meeting, July 21, 2026 (meeting files)City of Louisville, City Council · Jul 21, 2026City of Louisville, City Council's ordinance on the question, July 21, 2026.
- 2026 Ballot questionsCity of Louisville, City Clerk's Office
- City Council Meeting, April 28, 2026: City Council Meeting, April 28, 2026: agenda packet (Discussion / Direction: Potential 2026 Ballot…City of Louisville, City Council · Apr 28, 2026The source is a City of Louisville City Council agenda packet for April 28, 2026, and it identifies a possible 2026 charter amendment to align authorized executive session topics with the state Open Meetings Law.
- Boulder County compiled ballot content, General Election, Tuesday, November 3, 2026 (sample ballot, English)Boulder County Clerk and Recorder
- City Council Meeting, June 16, 2026: City Council Meeting, June 16, 2026: agenda packet (Potential 2026 Ballot Measures: Historic…City of Louisville, City Council · Jun 16, 2026The source is a June 16, 2026 Louisville City Council agenda packet that lists a potential 2026 charter amendment to align authorized topics for executive sessions with state open meetings law.
- Louisville officials could send 7 local ballot measures to votersBoulder Daily Camera · Jul 8, 2026 · subscription requiredBoulder Daily Camera's news story on the question, July 8, 2026.