This Lake County question lets the Mountain View Villages Water and Sanitation District borrow $1,800,000 for improvements it calls necessary for the continued operation of the district's wastewater system. The question pairs a loan agreement with the issuance of debt or another multiple fiscal year obligation, payable to a state authority. Total repayment may cost up to $4,140,000, at a maximum net effective interest rate of 6.5% a year. Within those ceilings, the Board of Directors decides how to issue the debt and on what terms. The question sets no final payment year.
Mountain View Villages Wastewater System Loan
I separate the design work from the construction. The Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund commitment the district holds covers design and engineering. For the work still to be built, the board states that it does not expect the total estimated cost to exceed the ballot amounts, and the question lets the board set the loan's terms.
This question pledges property taxes to the $1,800,000 wastewater loan with no limit on their rate whenever other district revenue falls short, in whatever amount the payments require. Colorado property taxes are already too high, and I do not support new debt that pledges more of them to construction costs the board has only estimated.
I recommend a no vote on Mountain View Villages Water and Sanitation District ballot issue: state agency loan for wastewater.

SHALL MOUNTAIN VIEW VILLAGES WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT DEBT BE INCREASED BY $1,800,000, WITH A MAXIMUM REPAYMENT COST OF UP TO $4,140,000, AND SHALL DISTRICT TAXES BE INCREASED UP TO $200,000 ANNUALLY, IF NECESSARY, FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING NECESSARY AND REQUIRED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CONTINUED OPERATION OF THE DISTRICT'S WASTEWATER SYSTEM BY THE EXECUTION OF A LOAN AGREEMENT AND ISSUANCE OF DEBT OR OTHER MULTIPLE FISCAL YEAR OBLIGATION PAYABLE TO A STATE AUTHORITY, WITH SUCH DEBT OBLIGATION TO BEAR INTEREST AT A MAXIMUM NET EFFECTIVE INTEREST RATE NOT TO EXCEED SIX AND A HALF-PERCENT (6.5%) PER ANNUM, TO BE EXECUTED AND ISSUED AND IN SUCH MANNER AND CONTAINING SUCH TERMS, CONSISTENT HEREWITH, AS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MAY DETERMINE; AND TO THE EXTENT OTHER DISTRICT LEGALLY AVAILABLE REVENUES ARE NOT SUFFICIENT FOR THE REPAYMENT OF SUCH DEBT, SHALL AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAXES BE INCREASED IN ANY YEAR WITHOUT LIMITATION AS TO RATE AND IN AN AMOUNT SUFFICIENT TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF AND INTEREST ON SUCH DEBT AS THE SAME BECOME DUE; AND SHALL ANY EARNINGS FROM THE INVESTMENT OF SUCH REVENUES AND TAXES AVAILABLE FOR REPAYMENT OF SUCH DEBT CONSTITUTE A VOTER APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE?
Authorizes up to $1.8 million in debt for wastewater improvements, the stated tax authority and property-tax backing when other available revenue is insufficient.
The district would not receive authority for this loan.
The question lets district taxes rise by up to $200,000 a year, if necessary. With a yes vote, in any year that other legally available district revenue is not sufficient for repayment, the district may increase property taxes without limitation as to rate, in the amount principal and interest require as they come due. Whatever the district earns by investing revenue and taxes available for repayment also counts, under a yes vote, as a voter-approved revenue change. The Colorado Division of Property Taxation lists the district's total assessed value for 2025 as $666,041, and its 2025 levy as 50 mills, raising $33,302.05.
Resolution No. 2026-2, which the board adopted on August 11, 2026, sets both this question and the water question. In it, the board records that the district has received a commitment for a Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund loan, which includes principal forgiveness, for design and engineering. It describes the project as generally consisting of converting aeration tanks to aerobic digesters for improved solids stabilization, adding a pump station and enhancing metals removal, along with related water and wastewater system improvements. The district still needs to secure funding to acquire, construct, install and complete the work. The board states that the district's treasury does not hold sufficient funds, and it does not expect to pay for the project on a pay-as-you-go basis from existing revenue. Its recitals add two expectations: that the total estimated cost stays within the ballot measures' dollar amounts, and that, for now, no state or federal grant will defray any part of it.
The water question carries the same borrowing, repayment, tax and interest limits for the district's water distribution system. Section 8 of the resolution lets the board issue debt and levy taxes under whichever measure a majority approves, so a majority for this question authorizes the wastewater loan and its taxes whatever the result on the water question.
- Lake County sample ballot — November 3, 2026 electionLeadville Herald Democrat · Oct 1, 2026