The 2026 election is over (November 3). Official results are on the Colorado Secretary of State’s website.
Kim MonsonKim Monson · Colorado Voter's Guide 2026
Roaring Fork School District RE-1
5C
Ballot issue

Roaring Fork School District Property Tax Override

School tax increaseOverride to the statutory maximum
Raises property taxes by up to $5.6 million for collection in 2027, with an ongoing school mill levy override and no end date.
Roaring Fork School District RE-1
On the November 3, 2026 ballot
Kim's Recommendation
NO
Vote No on Roaring Fork School District RE-1 Ballot Issue 5C

I find one item on Roaring Fork School District's list of arguments against Issue 5C decisive: wages have been stagnant for many people in the community, not just teachers. The district plans to spend most of the money on staff salaries and benefits, collected through a property tax with no end date from the homeowners and businesses of that same community.

State law gives the district until June 30, 2030, to ask voters for this override, and The Sopris Sun reports that the district enters this school year with a balanced budget. I do not see a deadline to ask voters as a reason to raise taxes.

I oppose a permanent property tax on a community where many people's wages have been stagnant, put to voters during a limited window in state law.

I recommend a no vote on Roaring Fork School District RE-1 Ballot Issue 5C.

Kim Monson
Kim Monson
Host, The Kim Monson Show · President, Colorado Union of Taxpayers · Colorado Voter's Guide 2026
Certified ballot question

SHALL ROARING FORK SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-1 TAXES BE INCREASED UP TO $5.6 MILLION IN 2026 (FOR COLLECTION IN 2027) AND IN SUCH AMOUNTS GENERATED ANNUALLY THEREAFTER AS DESCRIBED BELOW FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO: • INCREASING TEACHER AND STAFF PAY; • RETAINING AND RECRUITING HIGH-QUALITY TEACHERS AND STAFF; • STRENGTHENING ACADEMIC OUTCOMES AND ELIMINATING ACHIEVEMENT GAPS; WITH ALL SPENDING OF SUCH REVENUES REPORTED IN THE DISTRICT'S ANNUAL INDEPENDENT AUDIT PUBLISHED ON THE DISTRICT'S WEBSITE AND REVIEWED BY THE BOARD OF EDUCATION DIRECTORS; BY THE IMPOSITION OF A MILL LEVY THAT, WHEN COMBINED WITH OTHER MILL LEVY OVERRIDES APPROVED BY VOTERS FOR THE DISTRICT'S GENERAL FUND, GENERATES THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT PERMITTED BY SECTION 22-54-108(3)(B)(VI) AS OF JULY 1, 2026, BY THE LEVY OF PROPERTY TAXES AT A RATE SUFFICIENT TO PRODUCE SUCH AMOUNTS; WHICH TAXES SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO THE GENERAL FUND OF THE DISTRICT AND SHALL BE IN ADDITION TO THE PROPERTY TAXES THAT OTHERWISE WOULD BE LEVIED FOR THE GENERAL FUND?

A yes vote means

Authorizes the additional property tax for educational purposes, with the new levy and existing general-fund overrides together reaching the statutory maximum specified in the ballot.

A no vote means

Rejects this additional mill levy override. Existing district taxes remain.

Key facts
Initial tax authority
Up to $5.6 million for collection in 2027
District forecast
$5 million annually, based on enrollment projections
Term
No end date
Estimated first full fiscal year increase (TABOR notice)
$5,600,000
Fiscal year spending without the increase (TABOR notice)
$108,677,851
A Levy Tied to the State Maximum01

Roaring Fork School District RE-1 seeks to raise its property taxes by up to $5.6 million in 2026, for collection in 2027. The new levy, combined with the overrides voters approved earlier for the district's general fund, generates the maximum amount that state school finance law permitted as of July 1, 2026. The tax comes on top of the district's other general-fund property taxes and has no end date.

The TABOR notice estimates the maximum increase at $5,600,000 in the first full fiscal year. Without the increase, the notice estimates first-full-year spending at $108,677,851.

A State Deadline Sets the Timing02

The school board adopted the resolution referring the question on August 26, 2026, and the district's September newsletter reports a 5 to 0 vote. The resolution says changes to the cost-of-living factor in the state's school finance formula cut the district's per-pupil funding, and that state law gives affected districts until June 30, 2030, to place an override on the ballot to offset that change, for up to 30% of total program funding.

The district's web page says it has "a limited opportunity to ask local voters to replace that lost funding." At the August 26 meeting, board member Kathryn Kuhlenberg said "leaving this money on the table would be a tragedy for our staff and our district." The Sopris Sun reported that the district enters this school year with a balanced budget, and quoted Superintendent Anna Cole: "We are not on our heels this year." The supporters' statement in the TABOR notice says the district cut nearly $19 million over the past three years through staffing reductions, hiring freezes and other budget reductions.

Among the arguments against the measure, the district's web page notes that district voters approved a mill levy in 2021 and that wages have been stagnant for many people in the community, not just teachers.

The District's Forecast03

At current enrollment projections, the district expects $5 million a year. It puts the cost to commercial property at about $63.63 a year per $100,000 of value. The question sets no mill rate.

How the Money May Be Spent04

The question permits spending for educational purposes "INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO" raising teacher and staff pay, retaining and recruiting teachers and staff, and strengthening academic outcomes and eliminating achievement gaps. The district's annual independent audit, which the district publishes on its website and the board reviews, reports all spending of the new money.

The district's spending plan puts most of the money into salaries and benefits. The board's resolution bars the money from paying the salaries of senior district leaders, including the superintendent and the chiefs who run its departments. Neither the spending plan nor the salary bar appears in the ballot question.

The district’s spending plan
PurposeShare
Teacher and staff salaries and benefits80%
Recruitment and retention initiatives10%
District charter share10%
Roaring Fork School District, 2026 Mill Levy Override. Planned shares, not percentages required by the ballot.
Estimate the annual residential increase

The district projects $17.25 a year per $100,000 of actual home value.

Example: a $500,000 home

$500,000 ÷ $100,000 × $17.25 = $86.25 a year

Residential estimate using the district’s projection. The actual tax may differ. This is the added tax, not the total property-tax bill.

Roaring Fork School District, September 10, 2026 newsletter.
Campaign support and opposition05
For
TRACER filing, October 28, 2026
Sources06
Official documents
Pitkin County sample ballot, November 3, 2026 election
Roaring Fork School District board resolution, August 26, 2026
Roaring Fork School District, 2026 Mill Levy Override
Roaring Fork School District newsletter, September 10, 2026
Further reading
Official documents
Local government records
  • Roaring Fork Schools2026 Mill Levy Override - Roaring Fork Schools
    Roaring Fork Schools web page announcing the 2026 Mill Levy Override ballot measure.
  • 2026 Mill Levy OverrideRoaring Fork School District RE-1
    The source is a Roaring Fork Schools webpage directly describing the district’s proposed November 2026 mill levy override, including its purpose, estimated revenue, costs, and arguments.
  • September 2026 Family & Community NewsletterRoaring Fork School District RE-1 · Sep 10, 2026
    The source is a September 10, 2026 Roaring Fork School District ParentSquare newsletter that directly discusses ballot measure 5C as a mill levy override, including the board’s vote to place it on the November ballot, its intended funding uses, and projected revenue and taxpayer cost.
News coverage
Opinion and editorials
Campaigns and committees

The 2026 election is over. Requests for personalized guides closed on November 3, 2026. The full guide remains available to read.

Read the full guide